CAT VARC Previous Year Trends

CAT VARC Past Year Trend Analysis 2026: RC Types, Sources, Question Patterns & Strategy

10 years of VARC papers. One pattern. Most aspirants still miss it. This is the X-ray of CAT VARC — what has changed, what has not, what is coming in 2026, and exactly how to prepare for it.


1. VARC Exam Pattern — 5-Year Trend at a Glance

The structure of VARC has been stable since 2022. But “stable structure” does not mean “predictable exam.” What has changed is the inside — passage topics, option design, difficulty level, and the balance between RC and VA.

Table 1 — CAT VARC Pattern Evolution: 2020–2025

Year RC Questions VA Questions Total Difficulty Key Change
2020 18 (4 RCs) 8 26 Difficult New 2-hour pattern introduced. Fewer questions, same pressure.
2021 16 (4 RCs) 8 24 Moderate–Difficult Overall Q count reduced. RC-to-VA ratio unchanged.
2022 16 (4 RCs) 8 24 Moderate Fewer TITA questions. Sentence Insertion introduced. Odd One Out removed.
2023 16 (4 RCs) 8 24 Moderate–Difficult Odd One Out reintroduced. Abstract topics increased.
2024 16 (4 RCs) 8 24 Moderate–Difficult Para Jumbles absent. Options deliberately close. 500–550 word passages.
2025 16 (4 RCs) 8 24 Moderate–Difficult Diverse genres. Abstract philosophical/legal/ecological themes. Higher inference load.
Marking: +3 for correct MCQ · −1 for incorrect MCQ · +3 for correct TITA · 0 for wrong/unattempted TITA. VA questions are largely TITA (no negative marking) — never leave them blank.

What the Pattern Tells You

Since 2022, 4 RCs × 4 questions each = 16 RC questions + 8 VA questions = 24 total. This hasn’t changed. What HAS changed: RC passages are getting longer and more abstract, answer options are getting closer, and VA question types keep rotating (Parajumbles absent in 2024, Odd One Out absent in 2022, reintroduced in 2023). The only safe assumption for 2026: 4 RCs with 16 questions. Everything else is in play.


2. Types of RC Passages in CAT

CAT does not use random passages. Over 10 years, a clear genre fingerprint has emerged. Knowing the type of passage you are reading — before you finish reading it — changes how you approach the questions.

Genre A — Analytical / Argumentative

The author makes a claim and builds a case for it. Think economics, policy, philosophy, social commentary. Most common in CAT. Questions focus on author’s tone, central argument, and what would weaken/strengthen the claim.

Genre B — Scientific / Descriptive

A phenomenon is explained: animal behaviour, ecology, technology, medicine. Less argumentative, more informational. Questions test comprehension of cause-effect relationships, definitions, and factual inference.

Genre C — Abstract / Literary

The most challenging. Philosophy, aesthetics, cultural theory. The author’s position is often ambiguous. Dense language. Questions require identifying implied stance, not stated facts. Increasingly common since 2022.

Genre D — Historical / Sociological

Historical events, cultural practices, civilisation studies. Narrative structure but with implied arguments. Questions mix factual comprehension with inference.

📈 Abstract passages increasing since 2022
📚 2+ passages per slot are Analytical/Argumentative
✅ Scientific passages tend to be the most straightforward
⚠ Literary/Abstract = most traps in answer options

Table 2 — RC Genre Distribution by Year (Compiled from 3 slots each)

Year Analytical / Argumentative Scientific / Ecological Abstract / Literary Historical / Sociological
2020 ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★★
2021 ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★★
2022 ★★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★
2023 ★★★★ ★★ ★★★★ ★★★
2024 ★★★ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★
2025 ★★★ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★★
★ = relative frequency across 3 slots. Clear trend: abstract passages increasing every year since 2022. Purely scientific passages becoming less common relative to abstract ones.

3. RC Sources — Where CAT Passages Come From

CAT RC passages are always sourced from real publications — not fabricated. The IIMs select them from specific outlets that reflect the kind of analytical, evidence-based writing they want future managers to engage with.

Tier 1 Sources — Appear Repeatedly

The Economist
Aeon Essays / Aeon Magazine
The Guardian
Scientific American
The Atlantic
Public Books

Tier 2 Sources — Occasional Appearance

The New York Times Magazine
The Boston Review
Foreign Policy
Yale Global
The Washington Post
Smithsonian Magazine
The Wire Science
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Books & Academic Sources

JSTOR / Semantic Scholar
Academic books — non-fiction, philosophy, social science
NCERT / Government documents (rare but appeared in 2025)
Nature.com / Science journals

The Reading Habit Hack

Reading The Economist, Aeon, and The Guardian daily for 30 minutes is not just “general awareness” prep — it is direct VARC preparation. These three sources alone have appeared in 8 of the last 12 CAT papers (3 slots each). If you read one article from each per day for 90 days before CAT, you will have covered the exact writing style, vocabulary register, and argument structure that CAT RC tests.


4. Year-wise RC Source Data (2021–2025)

Table 3 — CAT 2025: RC Passages & Sources (All 3 Slots)

Slot RC Topic Source Words
Slot 1 Electronic Music JSTOR 507
Uncertain Times Aeon Magazine 540
Legal & Criminal Responsibility Internet Archives 535
Income Inequality Semantic Scholar 516
Slot 2 ChatGPT and OpenAI The Guardian 508
Astronomy NA 514
Cave Fish (Biology) Knowledgeable Magazine 534
Literature NA 485
Slot 3 Forest Act Forest Act Document 510
Tribal Verse NCERT 508
Dam (Environmental) Boston Review 506
AI Morality Aeon 499

Table 4 — CAT 2024: RC Passages & Sources (All 3 Slots)

Slot RC Topic Source Difficulty
Slot 1 Craftsmanship & Creativity The Economist Medium
Bandicoots in Australia The Smithsonian Medium
Digital Rights of Content The Guardian Easy
Behavioural Economics Public Books Medium
Slot 2 Spice Trade Yale Global Medium
Consequences of Technology NY Times Magazine Medium
Peer Review of Research Nature.com Medium
Animals vs Humans Vijesti.me Difficult
Slot 3 AI Regulation The Economist Medium
Contamination of Space Foreign Policy Medium
Moutai Madness (China) The Economist Medium–Difficult
Languages HuffPost Medium–Difficult

Table 5 — CAT 2023: RC Passages & Sources

Slot RC Topic Source Source Type
Slot 1 Wolf The Economist Magazine
Change in Work Culture Jared Diamond (essay) Online Article
Indian Ocean The Conversation Online News
Human Behaviour Public Books Academic
Slot 2 Fast Fashion & Pollution Prospect Magazine Magazine
Translated Netflix in Europe The Economist Magazine
Falling of Liberalism The Economist Magazine
Historical Facts & Interpretations What is History (book) Book
Slot 3 Global Warming & Colonialism The Wire Science Magazine
Romantic Aesthetics Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Academic Journal
Archaeology Paradox Los Angeles Times Newspaper
Rationality The Washington Post Newspaper

Table 6 — CAT 2022: RC Passages & Sources

Slot RC Topic Source Difficulty
Slot 1 Stoicism Aeon Essays Easy
Critical Theory Encyclopedia of Emotions Easy
The Undead Encyclopedia of the Undead Easy
Copies of Copies University of Witwatersrand Journal Medium
Slot 2 Octopuses Scientific American Easy
Engineering Problems Book excerpt Medium
Music A Million Years of Music (book) Medium
Social Institutions SAGE Handbook of Philosophy Medium
Slot 3 Sociology of Crime Wall Street Journal Easy
Logic of Bios Penguin History of Early India Medium
Orientalism Out of Control (book) Medium
Automation i-Researchnet (journal) Medium
Pattern: The Economist is the single most recurrent source — appearing in CAT 2022, 2023, 2024. Aeon Essays is #2. Together they account for ~25% of all RC passages in the last 4 years.
📷 Quantifiers CAT Academy on Instagram
X-Ray of the Last 10 Years of CAT VARC Papers

We broke down a decade of VARC papers — RC topics, sources, question types, difficulty shifts — into one must-read post. Before you read another RC passage, read this.

🔗 View the 9-Year VARC X-Ray post on Instagram →

5. Question Types in VARC

Every RC has 4 questions. Knowing what type of question is being asked before you start answering changes everything — because each type has a different answer strategy.

Table 7 — RC Question Types and How to Approach Each

Question Type What It Tests Frequency The Right Approach
Main Idea / Central Theme What is the passage ultimately saying? Very High — 1 per RC usually Look for the author’s conclusion, not just the subject. The answer must cover the entire passage, not one paragraph.
Inference What can be logically concluded from the passage? High — 1–2 per RC The answer must be supported by the text — not just plausible. If you need outside knowledge to validate it, it is wrong.
Author’s Tone / Attitude How does the author feel about the subject? Medium — often combined with other Qs Look for evaluative words (criticises, celebrates, dismisses, argues). Avoid extreme choices (outraged, ecstatic) unless clearly supported.
Specific Detail / Fact-Based What does the passage say about X? Medium — 1 per RC usually Go back to the specific paragraph. Do not rely on memory. The answer is directly in the text — paraphrase, not fabrication.
Strengthen / Weaken What would support or undermine the author’s argument? Low–Medium — occasional First identify the core argument. Then find the option that directly affects it — not peripherally related to the topic.
Title / Best Summary Which title best fits the passage? Low — occasional Same logic as Main Idea. Correct title captures the full scope — not just the opening topic or one example.

6. VA Trend — Para Jumbles, Para Summary & Odd One Out

VA questions (8 per paper) are the wildcard. The types keep rotating. Here is what the data shows:

Table 8 — VA Question Type Trend: 2020–2025

Year Para Jumbles (PJ) Para Summary (PS) Odd One Out (OOO) Sentence Insertion TITA Questions
2020 ✅ Present ✅ Present ✅ Present ❌ Absent High
2021 ✅ Present ✅ Present ✅ Present ❌ Absent High
2022 ✅ Present ✅ Present ❌ Absent ✅ Introduced Reduced
2023 ✅ Present ✅ Present ✅ Reintroduced ✅ Present Moderate
2024 ❌ Absent ✅ Present ✅ Present ✅ Present Moderate
2025 ✅ Returned ✅ Present ✅ Present ✅ Present Moderate
Key insight: Para Summary has appeared every single year since 2020 — prepare it without question. Para Jumbles disappeared in 2024 and returned in 2025. Prepare all four types: you cannot predict which three will appear. VA questions are mostly TITA — no negative marking. Never leave a VA question blank.

The VA Zero-Negative-Marking Strategy

All 4 VA question types (PJ, PS, OOO, Sentence Insertion) are TITA in most years — no negative marking. Even if you are unsure, attempt every VA question. A 50% accuracy on TITA VA questions = net +12 marks (4 right × 3 = 12). A 50% accuracy on MCQ RC questions = 4 right × 3 − 4 wrong × 1 = 8 net marks. TITA is more forgiving. Never skip VA questions on a time crunch — they are your free marks.


7. How to Eliminate Options & Read RCs

The single biggest reason aspirants lose marks in VARC is not lack of comprehension — it is poor elimination strategy. CAT RC answer options are designed to be close. Two options will often both seem right. One is. One is slightly off. Here is how to tell them apart.

The 4 Types of Wrong Options in CAT RC

Wrong Type 1

Too Extreme / Too Absolute

Uses words like “always,” “never,” “completely,” “proves,” “entirely.” CAT passages are nuanced — authors rarely make absolute claims. If an option sounds extreme, it is almost always wrong. Eliminate immediately.

Wrong Type 2

True But Not from the Passage

The statement might be factually correct in the real world, but the passage does not say it. RC questions test what the passage says, not what you know. If you are relying on outside knowledge to validate an option, that option is wrong.

Wrong Type 3

Partially Correct / Scope Error

The option captures one detail or one paragraph of the passage but misses the broader point. Most common on Main Idea and Title questions. The correct answer must cover the entire passage scope — not just the first paragraph.

Wrong Type 4

Opposite / Distortion

The option reverses the author’s position or subtly distorts the argument. Most dangerous because it sounds logical. Check against the exact wording of the relevant passage section before selecting.

The 3-Step RC Reading Method

  • Step 1 — Read for purpose, not for detail: Your first pass should answer one question: what is this author trying to say? Do not memorise facts. Understand the argument structure: what is the claim, what is the evidence, what is the conclusion?
  • Step 2 — Map the passage mentally: After reading, before looking at questions, summarise the passage in 1 sentence. “The author argues that X, using Y as evidence, and concludes Z.” If you can do this, you will eliminate 80% of wrong options immediately.
  • Step 3 — Answer before reading options: For Main Idea and Inference questions, form your answer in your head before looking at the four options. Then find the option closest to your answer. This prevents you from being seduced by a cleverly worded wrong option.

The 4-4 Time Strategy

40 minutes · 4 RCs · 8 VA questions. The golden ratio: spend 8 minutes per RC (4 minutes reading + 4 minutes answering). Leave 8 minutes for VA. That is 8 × 4 = 32 min for RC + 8 min for VA = exactly 40. If you go over 10 minutes on any single RC, skip one question and move on — do not blow your entire section time on one passage.


8. The Quantifiers VARC Strategy for CAT 2026

Everything above is data. This is what to do with it.

  • Read every day — the right sources: The Economist, Aeon Essays, The Guardian. One article per day, 30 minutes. Not for vocabulary. For argument structure fluency. After 90 days, you will recognise the writing style of your actual CAT passages before you finish the first paragraph.
  • Prepare all 4 VA types — PJ, PS, OOO, Sentence Insertion: Do not bet on which three will appear. The exam rotates them. Practise all four, with special emphasis on Para Summary (appeared every year without exception since 2020) and TITA strategy.
  • Do not leave VA blank: TITA = no negative marking. Attempt all 8 VA questions. Even a 40% accuracy on TITA is net positive. This is non-negotiable.
  • Abstract passages need a different mental gear: When you encounter a philosophical or literary passage, slow down by 20%. The density is higher. Rushing causes misinterpretation. Two minutes extra on a dense passage is cheaper than getting 3 questions wrong on it.
  • Practice with real sources: Download Quantifiers’ free VARC study material — RC passages curated from the exact sources CAT uses. Reading random passages online does not build the specific comprehension muscle CAT tests.
  • Mock → Analyse → Mock again: After every mock, review every RC question you got wrong. Identify which Wrong Option Type (1–4 above) trapped you. If you are consistently falling for “Partially Correct” options, your scope-mapping needs work. If you are falling for “True But Not from Passage,” you are over-relying on knowledge instead of the text.
Join Quantifiers CAT 2026 WhatsApp Group — Daily Targets, YT Lectures, 24x7 Doubt Solving

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

best CAT Coaching

We at Quantifiers understand and deliver on the personal attention each of our students requires. Whether it is through our pedagogy that enables non-engineers or non-math background students, our constant effort to proactively provide solutions, or our focus on our student’s goals.